vaayaa Inclusive Education
Micro-Degree Hospitality, tourism and ground transportation (vehicle rental)

Ground Transportation and Vehicle Rental Management: Industry Report

Market structure, operator economics and outlook for vehicle rental, based on the latest available data

  • Global, with United States and North America detail where the evidence is US-specific; company figures are global consolidated or Americas segment fig...
  • Data period: Latest available data
  • 10 min read
  • 12 sources
  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Average revenue per unit per month, U.S. rental operations 1,379USD per unit per month Observed United States, Latest available period [1]
  • Hertz net loss, global consolidated 703USD million (net loss) Observed Global, Latest full year [3]
  • Hertz consolidated vehicle utilization 84percent Observed Global, Latest third quarter [4]
  • Avis Americas revenue per day 66.01USD per rental day Observed Americas, Latest fourth quarter [8]

Summary

Vehicle rental is a large, pricing-sensitive market. Research estimates place U.S. car rental revenue at about 40.6 billion USD 1, although another estimate gives 65.3 billion USD 2, so market size is unresolved. The clearest company evidence comes from Hertz and Avis. Both reported net losses in the latest full year despite revenues of 8.5 billion and 11.7 billion USD 36. Hertz utilization rose to 84 percent in the latest third quarter 4. Avis credits lower fleet costs for EBITDA gains, and its Americas revenue per day fell 4 percent in the latest fourth quarter 78. Principal risks are pricing pressure, residual values and fleet cost volatility. Peer-to-peer platforms such as Turo are growing in relevance but are not measured in the same way 11. The source pack contains no verified data on labor, customer ratings, sustainability or regulation, so these areas are reported as gaps.

Key findings

  1. 1

    Market size estimates conflict

    U.S. industry revenue is estimated at 40.6 billion USD in one source and 65.3 billion USD in another, with no reconciliation. A North American estimate excluding peer-to-peer rentals is 42.61 billion USD. Definitions differ across these estimates.

    Confidence: Qualitative
  2. 2

    Large chains report losses on large revenue bases

    Hertz reported 8,504 million USD in total revenues and a net loss of 703 million USD for the latest full year. Avis reported 11,652 million USD in revenues and a net loss of 995 million USD for the same period.

    Confidence: High
  3. 3

    Hertz utilization improved in the latest third quarter

    Consolidated vehicle utilization rose to 84 percent from 82 percent a year earlier. This is a company-reported quarterly figure and does not show a full-year or industry trend.

    Confidence: Medium
  4. 4

    Pricing pressure and fleet cost reduction are the main levers

    Avis Americas revenue per day fell 4 percent year over year in the latest fourth quarter. Avis expects per-unit fleet costs to fall from about 400 USD to 320 to 330 USD per month for the full year, a company forecast.

    Confidence: Medium
  5. 5

    Individual renters are the largest customer group

    Individual renters generated about two-thirds of North American vehicle rental revenue in the latest period. This is a market research estimate that excludes peer-to-peer rentals.

    Confidence: Medium

1Industry definition and scope

This report covers short-term rental of cars and light vehicles by commercial operators, the vehicle rental part of ground transportation. Market research treats U.S. car rental as a distinct revenue line 12. The sources do not define the boundary in the same way, so the figures below are indicative rather than strictly comparable.

Peer-to-peer platforms sit at the edge of scope. One research firm's North American estimate excludes peer-to-peer rentals 10. Turo describes itself as a marketplace where private owners rent vehicles, and the company does not own or maintain the cars 11. Ride-hailing, taxis, chauffeur services and vehicle leasing are outside scope. The source pack has no verified figures for them.

Vehicle utilization, revenue per day and revenue per unit are company-defined measures. Avis states that it measures performance mainly through rental days, revenue per day, vehicle utilization and per-unit fleet costs 6. The pack gives no common industry definition for these metrics, so they should not be compared directly across companies.

Geography and period: company figures are global or Americas segment figures as stated in each release. Market-level detail is U.S. or North American. Periods are the latest full year and the latest quarters reported in each source.

Scope follows the market definitions used by the cited sources. No single definition is verified.

2Market size, structure and value chain

Market size estimates diverge. A U.S. estimate puts projected industry revenue at 40.6 billion USD, a modest rise on a flat prior level 1. A second market research estimate puts U.S. revenue at 65.3 billion USD and forecasts growth at a compound annual rate, but the rate is not stated in the pack 2. A North American estimate excluding peer-to-peer rentals is 42.61 billion USD 10. The gap between the first two U.S. figures is about 24.7 billion USD, and the sources do not explain it. The defensible reading is a U.S. market in the range of roughly 40 to 65 billion USD, with the precise size unresolved.

A global forecast puts the car rental market at 135,000 million USD, labelled as a forecast 9. The pack gives no method for this figure, and it cannot be reconciled with the U.S. or North American estimates.

By segment, one U.S. estimate identifies leisure as the largest revenue segment at 27.8 billion USD, with business rental at 16.3 billion USD 2. These two estimates sum to 44.1 billion USD, below the 65.3 billion total from the same source, so the segment basis is unclear.

The value chain runs from fleet acquisition to rental operations and then to vehicle disposal. In the U.S., rental operations bought about 1.16 million new vehicles in the latest period, roughly 120,000 more than the prior period 1. Hertz reported depreciation of revenue-earning vehicles of 1,927 million USD in the latest full year 3, which shows that fleet cost is a major part of the cost base. Average revenue per unit per month in U.S. rental operations was 1,379 USD in the latest period, after a fall from a revised prior level 1.

Key stakeholders include fleet-owning operators, vehicle suppliers, booking platforms and private owners who list cars on marketplaces 11. The pack does not quantify the cost shares of labor, insurance, fuel or facilities.

  • Average revenue per unit per month, U.S. rental operations 1,379USD per unit per month Observed United States, Latest available period [1]
Estimated U.S. and North American car rental revenue by sourceUSD billion
  • U.S. industry revenue (S1)40.6 USD billion
  • North America excluding peer-to-peer (S10)42.61 USD billion
  • U.S. industry revenue (S2)65.3 USD billion

Three research estimates with different definitions. Shown to illustrate the size of the disagreement, not as comparable values. The U.S. figures are from S1 and S2; the North American figure excludes peer-to-peer rentals (S10).

View the data
ItemValue
U.S. industry revenue (S1)40.6 USD billion
North America excluding peer-to-peer (S10)42.61 USD billion
U.S. industry revenue (S2)65.3 USD billion

The three market estimates conflict and are not reconciled in any source in the pack. The chart shows the range only.

Assumptions behind these figures

  • Estimates are treated as estimates, not observed values.

3Customers, demand and adoption

Individual renters generated about two-thirds of North American vehicle rental revenue in the latest period, according to an estimate that excludes peer-to-peer rentals 10. Leisure is the largest U.S. segment in another estimate 2. Together these suggest that leisure and personal travel drive most demand, although the sources do not give one consistent split.

The sources note holiday and leisure peaks only in qualitative terms. Seasonality, booking lead times and day-of-week patterns are not quantified in the pack.

Recent demand signals are mixed. Avis said demand continued year over year in its full-year results 6. Its Americas revenue per day, however, fell 4 percent year over year in the latest fourth quarter to 66.01 USD 8. Hertz attributed a fall in total revenues mainly to lower pricing and lower volume 3. Pricing pressure is the clearest common theme across the company releases.

Purchasing criteria, customer ratings, loyalty and repeat rental rates are not verified by any source in the pack. Average transaction value per rental is also not verified.

Booking channel mix is a gap. One research estimate puts the online booking share at 72 percent, but it is labelled a forecast and has no primary source, so it should be treated as unverified 9.

Demand conclusions rely on company commentary and one estimate of customer mix. No independent demand survey is in the pack.

4Competitive landscape and key players

The pack covers three representative provider types: two asset-owning chains with global fleets (Hertz and Avis) and one peer-to-peer marketplace (Turo). No verified data on independent operators is available, so their share and performance cannot be assessed.

Hertz reported 8,504 million USD in total revenues and a net loss of 703 million USD for the latest full year 3. In its third-quarter release, consolidated vehicle utilization rose to 84 percent from 82 percent a year earlier 4. First-quarter utilization was 79 percent in both compared periods 5. The gap between first and third quarter suggests seasonal swings in utilization, but the pack does not measure this as a pattern.

Avis reported full-year revenues of 11,652 million USD and a net loss of 995 million USD 6. Its third-quarter revenue was about 3.5 billion USD, with revenue per day of 73.23 USD excluding exchange rate effects, down 1 percent 7. Americas Adjusted EBITDA reached 398 million USD in the third quarter, driven by lower fleet costs and higher rental days. International Adjusted EBITDA reached 190 million USD 7.

Turo reported revenue of 879.7 million USD in the latest period 11. It does not own the vehicles it lists, so its cost base and risk profile differ from Hertz and Avis. The figure comes from a compiled secondary source and is not verified against company filings.

The pack has no verified market share data for the leading operators, so concentration cannot be measured. Interpretation: the two chains compete on price and fleet cost, and both report losses at large scale. Scale and fleet cost control appear to be the main levers, but this is inferred from company metrics, not from market share data.

  • Hertz net loss, global consolidated 703USD million (net loss) Observed Global, Latest full year [3]
  • Hertz consolidated vehicle utilization 84percent Observed Global, Latest third quarter [4]
  • Avis Americas revenue per day 66.01USD per rental day Observed Americas, Latest fourth quarter [8]
Representative provider types compared. Periods differ: Hertz and Avis full-year results, quarterly operating metrics as stated, and Turo's latest reported revenue from a secondary source.
Operator Business model Latest revenue (USD million) Net result (USD million) Operating indicator Data note
Hertz (global, consolidated) Owns and rents fleet 8,504 total revenues -703 net loss Third-quarter utilization 84 percent, up from 82 percent Full-year figures from annual filing; quarterly figures from release
Avis Budget Group (global) Owns and rents fleet 11,652 full-year revenues -995 net loss Third-quarter revenue per day 73.23 USD excluding exchange rate effects; Americas fourth-quarter revenue per day 66.01 USD Full-year and quarterly releases
Turo (global) Peer-to-peer marketplace; does not own cars 879.7 reported revenue Not in pack Not in pack Secondary compiled source; period not verified against filings

Only verified company figures are shown. The Turo row relies on a secondary source and is marked as such.

Assumptions behind these figures

  • Company metrics are not directly comparable because each company defines them differently.

5Technology, operations and workforce

Fleet performance is the main operating lever in the pack. Utilization, revenue per unit and per-unit fleet cost are the metrics companies emphasize 6. A vendor benchmark describes a fleet utilization rate of 75 to 85 percent as optimal for profitability. This is a vendor claim with no stated period or geography 12, so it is not treated as verified.

Hertz attributed lower depreciation of revenue-earning vehicles to its fleet refresh and stronger residual values at disposal 3. Avis expects per-unit fleet costs of around 400 USD per month in the first quarter of the coming year, improving to 320 to 330 USD for the full year. This is a company forecast 8.

Electrification is a relevant technology trend. Electric vehicles were about one-quarter of global new-car sales in the latest period 9. This is a general market figure, not a rental fleet figure. The pack does not show what share of rental fleets is electric or how charging affects utilization.

Labor productivity, labor cost share, staffing levels and skills supply for vehicle rental are not verified by any source in the pack. Operating models that depend on counters, shuttles or staffed locations therefore cannot be assessed from the sources.

Digital operations are implied by the emphasis on online booking 9, but the pack does not document yield management, pricing tools or digital check-in practices.

Technology and workforce conclusions are limited to fleet metrics. The pack has no verified workforce data.

6Regulation, standards, risk and sustainability

The source pack contains no regulator, standards body or government rule for vehicle rental. This report therefore cannot identify binding requirements, proposed rules or voluntary guidance for any jurisdiction. Any further analysis should name the jurisdiction and separate binding law from proposals and voluntary standards.

Topics not covered by a verified source include consumer protection and rental disclosure rules, insurance requirements, vehicle safety and recall obligations, privacy rules for renter data, and accessibility requirements. These are material for operators, but the pack does not evidence them.

Sustainability is not measured in the pack. There are no verified emissions, fuel efficiency, waste or sustainability metrics for vehicle rental operators. The only related figure is the global electric vehicle share of new-car sales 9. Health and safety incident rates are also absent.

Financial and operational risk is visible in the sources. Hertz and Avis both reported net losses in the latest full year 36. Residual values and fleet costs are material, since Hertz credited stronger residual values for lower depreciation 3. Interpretation: a fall in residual values or a rise in fleet prices would reverse that benefit. This is not a sourced forecast.

This section is general information. It is not legal, regulatory, safety or financial advice.

Gaps are stated rather than filled. No regulatory or sustainability sources were included in the pack.

Assumptions behind these figures

  • Regulatory and sustainability conclusions are limited to what the pack shows, which is nothing verified on rules.

7Challenges, opportunities and case examples

Revenue can fall while losses persist. Hertz's total revenues fell, citing lower pricing and lower volume 3. Avis reported a net loss on revenues above 11 billion USD and said demand continued year over year 6. Scale alone does not guarantee profit in the latest period.

Fleet cost discipline is the clearest opportunity in the pack. Avis Americas Adjusted EBITDA rose on lower fleet costs and higher rental days 7, and its fourth-quarter materials describe fleet cost reductions driving EBITDA gains despite a revenue decline 8.

Case example 1, Hertz: the company's third-quarter release describes record utilization, with consolidated utilization at 84 percent 4. Utilization gains help only if pricing holds, and Hertz's full-year revenues fell 3. The two results point in different directions, which limits what any single metric can show.

Case example 2, Turo: a marketplace model moves fleet ownership to private owners, so the platform does not carry vehicle depreciation 11. The pack does not report Turo's margins or host economics, so its profitability cannot be compared with the asset-owning chains.

Digital distribution is a further opportunity. A forecast puts the online booking share at 72 percent 9, but this is unverified. Interpretation: online channels could widen reach and lower distribution cost, but the pack does not quantify either effect.

Case examples are drawn from the company releases and one marketplace profile in the pack. Independent operators are not represented.

8Outlook and strategic implications

Near term: revenue is under pressure from pricing, based on company results 78. The U.S. estimate describes modest growth 1, which points to a flat to slightly rising market rather than rapid expansion. These are scenarios drawn from the sources, not forecasts made by this report.

Medium term: research firms forecast growth 29, but their estimates conflict and the growth rate is not stated in the pack. Fleet cost is the key swing factor. If the company forecast of 320 to 330 USD per unit per month is achieved 8, a major cost line would fall.

Uncertainties include market size definitions, the treatment of peer-to-peer rentals, the reliability of estimates and the trend among independent operators, which is unknown.

Implications for operators: track utilization, revenue per day and fleet cost together, since the sources show that each can move independently. Implications for investors and lenders: verify company figures directly, as this is general information and not investment advice. Implications for platforms and suppliers: the shift toward marketplace and digital channels is claimed but not measured. Implications for public agencies: verified regulatory, safety and sustainability data are needed before the sector's broader impacts can be assessed.

Outlook statements are labelled as interpretation where they go beyond sourced figures.

Assumptions behind these figures

  • Scenarios are interpretive and rest on the company and market figures in the pack.

9Conclusion

The sourced evidence describes a large, pricing-sensitive market in which major chains report losses on large revenues, and where fleet cost management is the clearest lever. Market size remains uncertain, and labor, regulation and sustainability cannot be assessed from the pack. The most defensible takeaways are the company results and the data gaps.

How this was built

This report uses only the source pack. Company figures are reported by the companies and cover global consolidated or Americas segments as stated. Market estimates come from research firms and differ in definition. Vendor and secondary-source material is marked as such. Interpretation is labelled where it goes beyond the sources.

Limits to keep in mind

  • Market size estimates conflict (40.6, 42.61 and 65.3 billion USD) and are not reconciled.
  • Company metrics such as utilization, revenue per day and revenue per unit use different definitions and are not comparable with industry averages.
  • Hertz and Avis figures do not represent the full market. Independent operators and small fleets have no published data in the pack.
  • No verified data on average daily rate or revenue per available car across the industry, average transaction value, repeat rental rates, covers or seasonality.
  • No verified data on labor productivity, labor cost share, staffing or customer ratings.
  • No verified regulatory, standards, safety, privacy or sustainability sources for vehicle rental.

Sources

  1. 1

    U.S. Car Rental Revenue Crosses $40 Billion (Auto Rental News Fact Book)

    Auto Rental News News report

    autorentalnews.com
  2. 2

    U.S. Car Rental Industry Market Analysis (Investment Perspective)

    MMCG Investment Market research

  3. 3

    Hertz Global Holdings Form 10-K Annual Report

    Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. Company report

  4. 4

    Hertz Q3 Earnings Release: Hertz Transformation Drives Record Utilization

    Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. (via Business Wire) Company report

  5. 5

    Hertz Q1 Earnings Release

    Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. Company report

  6. 6

    Avis Budget Group Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year Results

    Avis Budget Group, Inc. Company report

  7. 7

    Avis Budget Group Q3 Results Press Release

    Avis Budget Group, Inc. Company report

    sec.gov
  8. 8

    Avis Budget Group Q4 slides: Fleet cost reductions drive EBITDA gains despite revenue decline

    Investing.com News report

  9. 9

    Global Car Rental Market Share, Companies and Trends Report

    Ken Research Market research

    kenresearch.com
  10. 10

    North America Vehicle Rental Market Growth Report

    Mordor Intelligence Market research

    mordorintelligence.com
  11. 11

    Turo (company)

    Wikipedia (compiled from company and press reporting) News report

    en.wikipedia.org
  12. 12

    Car rental industry terms explained: boost fleet performance

    Nomora Vendor report

    nomora.io
Hourly Active: 39,047 Learners